As we told our Board, auditing is awesome. Graham even ran a
workshop with the Board members to teach them how to complete this crucial governance
task during the year – they need to complete one full Bank audit in November
for GIVE. We have taught the Board a very simplified version of how to audit
that boils down into one sentence: what Maurice has recorded that we have in
the Bank, and what the Commercial Bank Account says we have. Easy, yet elegant.
Our Bank runs on economies of scale. It is too expensive for
the majority of the villagers to travel to Kisumu to deposit their money into a
commercial bank. Not only is the cost of travel too high for most, but also the
fees incurred when setting up an account, or meeting minimum deposit amounts is
beyond the scope of the villagers financial powers. Our Bank acts as a
middleman, who collects all the villagers’ deposits then only makes one trip
into Kisumu for 300 savers each week. [side: the average deposit is about 100
KSh. That’s $1.30. The average Bank account holds about 600 KSH].
So we set up this lovely equation. All of the files are
paper based, and kept in three binders that Maurice carries to and from the
Bank each operating day. Step one: total up all of the recorded client deposits
from the client files. Add to that amount the amount of Project Money that GIVE
holds in the same commercial bank account in order for Maurice to pay for
expenses associated with the Bank. Next, subtract all of the expenses that have
been incurred in the period. This is done by comparing all receipts to Maurice’s
expense book. This equals A. Step two: Take the commercial bank balance. Remove
all interest that has been added to the sum, and add back any tax and fees
deducted. A should equal B.
Only problem with this entire procedure is that the
commercial bank account does not fulfill one of the two jobs that it was set up
for. Yes, all of the client money that has been deposited is safe and sound,
and so is the project money. The problem lies in trying to withdraw the project
money. This ‘feature’ hasn’t worked since February, and Maurice has been
spending his own money in order to cover all expenses that the Bank has had.
This completely messes up the entire equation. It did not make any sense to the
Board members as to the way that we had to bypass this error (by only counting
the expenses that were able to be paid for with those withdrawals).
THANK GOODNESS FOR FREDRICK
Fredrick has been jumping in to explain concepts to the
Board whenever we have needed him. Which seems to be a lot, since a lot of the
concepts become lost in translation, whether it is from our side explaining a
term, or from the clients asking questions. Fredrick would just jump in, say
something intelligent in English, then go right on explaining it to everyone in
Luo. If there was a way we could grade the Board on their skills, he would get
a mathematical A+.
Even with Fredrick’s
explanations, Graham and I aren’t one hundred percent convinced by their
ability to complete the entire thing on their own. We’ll be creating a
step-by-step auditing procedure in their manuals. We are also hoping that
Fredrick spearheads this one
No comments:
Post a Comment